Snack: Livid Letter Lashes Out
Dear Editor,
Snack. I’m livid. It’s a principles issue.
It’s a with-age-comes-privileges issue. It’s
a this is the way things always have been so wait your
turn, because you’re certainly not going to want
to have snack at Frank on Wednesdays when you’re
living up north issue. First and foremost, however,
it’s a process issue.
I think the manner in which those representatives got
Snack moved to Frank is extremely irresponsible. Perhaps
senators living on North Campus should enter negotiations
with Dean Quinley and Dining Services about putting
laxatives in the food at Frank because "it's what
the student body wants." Had this been a democratic
process, it would have incorporated the fact that upperclassmen
were more willing to concede snack on Thursday nights
because less attend. Most upperclassmen know that the
food at the Junior Senior Social and Symposium is better
than food at snack. That’s why we don’t
go to snack on Thursday nights.
First ID moves to 11, now Snack is moving to Frank
one night a week? What’s next, are we going to
hire people to do underclassmen’s laundry and
homework? If so would this be a work study job? How
much would it pay? But I digress.
Snack belongs up North.
Lividly,
Juan Matute ’04
|