Exhibit Review is Misleading
Dear Editor,
I just read the review on artist Abdelali Dahrouch's
Project Series 19 Installation in the "Arts and
Features Section" of the Pomona College paper by
Henry Bley-Vroman. I want to tell Bley-Vroman that he
does very important work reviewing various shows as
a staff writer; however, in the future it would be professional
if he made a practice of talking with the artist, curator,
or, at the very least, reviewing the accompanying announcement/press
materials before writing a published review. Any of
these would situate Dahrouch's work in significant ways
that Bley-Vroman overlooks and misrepresents in his
recent review.
His impressions, while interesting, are not at all
what Dahrouch was engaging in "Desert Sin, Revisited,"
and most of Bley-Vroman's descriptions of the installation
are incorrect and uninformed (i.e. projected onto the
floor piece is blowing sand, not "blue static,"
and the sound piece is composed of desert winds commingled
with George W. Bush's speeches, not "screaming"--both
of these are clearly explained and contextualized in
the introductory label at the entrance of the gallery
space, as well as in the exhibition catalogue).
I wrote the article in the accompanying catalogue
that you can find at www.pomona.edu/museum.
Go to "Project
Series" under "Past" and bring up Dahrouch's
home page. It is very important that as cultural critics
we are informed when we write our reviews, and of course
it is only respectful to the press with which we are
affiliated, the public to which we are accountable,
and the subject matter/artist to whom we are responsible.
Best of luck with your future projects.
Sincerely yours,
Laura J. Kuo
Assistant Professor
Women's Studies and Art History
Pomona College
|