| New
West Wing: Regime Change
By Sam Cross
Staff Writer
The West Wing returned to television last Wednesday,
fresh from its fourth Emmy but bereft of its creator
and chief writer, Aaron Sorkin. Sorkin was responsible
for the dramatic arc of the show’s first five
years and also for the intellectual, heavily allusive
banter of its characters. The question, now that Sorkin
has left, is whether or not the show is capable of maintaining
its tone and complexity.
The show’s new creative director, John Wells
(who has been involved in a non-writing capacity with
the show since its inception) seems eager to prove that
The West Wing can remain relevant in today’s political
climate. Witness, for example, the dramatic resignation
of President Bartlett (Martin Sheen) in the face of
his daughter’s kidnapping and his temporary replacement
by the massive, stereotypically republican John Goodman.
Goodman barrels his way through the first episode like
a vigorous human tank, spouting political improprieties
crude enough to redden the sensitive ears of the show’s
regular cast (advisors to the recently departed Bartlett).
However, pains have been taken to lend Goodman’s
character some depth. We are clearly supposed to sit
up and consider the unthinking liberal bias we feel
along with the old staff toward Goodman as he capably,
if jingoistically, answers questions at a press conference.
This is probably for the best. Especially of late,
The West Wing had resorted too often to ironic, superior
eyebrow raising at the conservative policies of the
never-mentioned but always incorporeally-present President
Bush. While the Goodman character is open, by virtue
of his immurement in heavy Southern-Republican cliché,
to even more easy ridicule than Bush is, he is at least
a present opponent. Wells has retained at least one
outspoken conservative critic as a consultant for the
show.
Unfortunately, Sorkin’s abdication of his role
is felt heavily in the new flatness of the dialogue.
While I was often tired by Sorkin’s smugly elaborate,
unrealistic banter, I won’t deny that it was entertaining.
It definitely did a good job of flattering arrogant,
marginally involved armchair political critics such
as myself into thinking that people like us were smart
enough to run the country, and quick enough on the verbal
uptake to confound easily the backward political ambitions
of any conservative opponents that might crop up.
While Wells, who wrote this season’s first episode,
has obviously strived to replicate Sorkin’s fast-paced
style, the result is usually not comparable to earlier
episodes, and is sometimes embarrassingly unsuccessful.
If I can’t watch my favorite arrogant-intellectual
avatars engage in the kind of offhand allusion to political
history that I’m sure I could if given the opportunity,
I’m especially uncongenial to verbal buffoonery
on their part. This was my reaction to an unfortunate
exchange in the first episode on the perils of mentioning
recession.
The actors, however, continue to deliver excellent
performances, especially Allison Janney as White House
Press Secretary C.J. Cregg. While Richard Schiff, as
a supposedly brilliant presidential speechwriter, looks
occasionally embarrassed by the lines Wells has given
him to spit out, the overall effect is that of a team
of talented individuals pulling together ably in the
face of an executive crisis.
This, of course, is what the first episode of the new
season is mostly about. It’s heavy on serious
presidential goings-on, worries about the sanctity of
the presidency, the appropriate response to terrorism,
and the functioning of our government in a time of crisis.
Wells and company wouldn’t have twisted things
more topically if they had dramatized an invasion of
Iraq.
To his credit, Wells handles this official mucking
about proficiently; the swelling, somber music that
rises up from time to time to ensure our serious emotional
investment only rarely strikes a discordant, kitschy
note. Things do get slightly out of hand as we’re
treated to a montage of gifts and cards left for the
kidnapped daughter of President Bartlett, but Sorkin
himself was hardly innocent of wallowing from time to
time in heavy melodrama. The fact that the scene and
an ensuing somber Eucharist rely for most of their punch
on the events of 9/11 is unfortunate but excusable.
It would, after all be irresponsible for a show about
the chief executive not to address these issues; erring
on the side of seriousness is no great sin.
The show’s national plotline charges ahead as
enthusiastically as its new President, and so manages
to absorb its dialogic lapses in a national-security
fueled rush. If the interstices between the flashing
tactical maps and grim talk of bombing are somewhat
tired, I’m still willing to allow the new writing
team time to produce something a little more convincing
in terms of interpersonal dynamics. I would hope, however,
that for all its increased emphasis on relevancy, the
show doesn’t descend into melodramatic unbelievability.
Watching Bartlett squabble with his wife over whether
or not she should have been in on the decision to assassinate
a foreign diplomat and whether or not the assassination
caused the kidnapping of her daughter begins to strain
my capacity for disbelief. Although the show’s
new willingness to grapple with very current issues
is refreshing, it has historically derived a great deal
of its basic believability from its repartee; shifting
back into a less fraught, more episodic atmosphere will
be the real challenge of the coming weeks for “The
West Wing.”
All this aside, though, The West Wing still does a
spectacular job of bringing its viewers a compelling
vision of American leadership. Martin Sheen’s
beleaguered Bartlett has never seemed quite so human
as he does now; he manages quite affectingly to be both
a distraught father and a near-despairing temporary
ex-president. Moments like these have transferred well
into the new season, and not just because of the prowess
of the show’s actors. I’m willing to play
along with the supposedly edgy focus on current events,
if it means I’ll get to keep enjoying scenes,
and eventually plotlines, that maintain this quality.
|