| Sub-Free
Opening Still Raises Questions
By Caitlin Collins
Staff
Writer
In response to concerns about sexual abuse during the
first weeks of college and to provide new students with
an opportunity to experience their first days of college
without alcohol or drugs, Pomona College has continued
its own steps to decrease alcohol abuse with its annual
substance free opening.
During this time, no Pomona student was allowed to serve
or consume alcohol on campus, and first years were required
to attend a seminar and discussion on the dangers related
to over consumption of alcohol.
“I think substance free opening is a very good
idea,” said sponsor Jason Ganns ’06. “It
raises awareness regarding issues of alcohol poisoning
and sexual assault that definitely do need to be entertained.”
This year, Pomona’s “dry campus” policy
extended to Monday, September 8, the beginning of the
second week of classes, in an effort to gradually accustom
first years to the college environment.
“I think college is a lot more raucous; you’re
a lot less protected than you are when you are living
in your parents’ house,” said Dean of Students
Ann Quinley. “Substance free opening allows our
first year class to come here and to socialize and to
get to know people without a lot of alcohol around on
campus.”
Substance free opening was also instituted to address
safety concerns.
“There are statistics that show that a high percentage
of people who suffer sexual misconduct have this happen
right at the beginning of school. So I think that there
are a group of people who think that if we have less
alcohol on campus, we will have less problems with sexual
misconduct,” said Quinley.
“Studies have shown that a high percentage of
sexual assaults that occur on campus occur within the
first few weeks, and a lot of it is alcohol related,”
said resident advisor John Clithero ’05.
Many students expressed support for the reasoning behind
substance-free opening, but the question of whether
or not substance-free was adhered to this year is much
less clear.
“According to the letter of the law, substance
free opening was not necessarily followed,” said
Ganns, “but I think that even when there were
indiscretions, most people did follow the general feeling
behind substance free opening, namely to promote safe
alcohol consumption on campus."
Furthermore, some students expressed a desire for two
main changes in the policy: substance free opening should
only be for south campus, and it should end on the weekend
rather than a Monday, as other Claremont colleges do,
had substance free openings that ended on the weekend.
“I think it would be good to have all the colleges
end on the same day, but ending on a Monday is bad because
it encourages people to drink on a weeknight,”
said Andrew Cooledge ’07.
“We tried ending it on Saturday, but when we end
it on Saturday, it is just a nightmare,” said
Quinley. “If we end it on Monday dry week is going
to end in a more gradual, wind-down kind of way, and
that just seems to work better for our campus. I can’t
control what the other campuses do.”
Containing substance free opening solely to South Campus
is also not likely for the future.
“I don’t think that it would really work
to limit it, but I think that would make it a little
easier because they don’t really enforce it on
north campus anyway,” said Danny Shickich ’05.
“If we only had south campus substance free then
all of south campus would be traveling north, and I
think we really would have problems with sexual misconduct,”
said Quinley.
As a whole, the Pomona administration deemed this year’s
substance free opening a success, and Pomona will continue
the tradition in the future.
“I think that towards the end that it may have
been bent a little bit, but as a whole it made the drinking
community at Pomona safer,” said Tiana Leeds ’07.
|