Iraq Discussion's Focus Was
Too Single-Minded
By Ben Heidlage '06
I am writing to voice my disappointment with the discussion
on Iraq, held Monday, March 24, in the Frank Blue Room. After
reading President Stanley's letter, I came to the discussion
expecting a diverse set of opinions and an in-depth dialogue.
Instead, I listened to three professors, all with nearly indistinguishable
opinions, talk about why they disliked the corporate media.
While I myself agree with many of the statements made, I did
not go to the discussion to listen to my internal dialogue.
I was particularly disappointed for two reasons: first with
the topic in general, and second with the way the topic was
discussed.
First of all, the topic was wholly unoriginal. With the outbreak
of war, I expected a discussion that would address the issues
that had arisen in the past couple of days. The role of economics
in the war, the issues of international diplomacy and respect,
the role of the U.N. in the future, all are examples of pertinent
and very timely topics. Instead, the discussion focused on
the role of the media in the new war. The discussion harked
back to an earlier talk that I had attended in the first semester.
The viewpoints were the same, and the criticisms of large
media corporations tired and boring.
The discussion could have been worth some value had there
been something that resembled meaningful discourse. While
the speakers did discuss the role of media, the opinions were
identical, and there was not one disagreement. In addition,
I felt that some of the speakers hadn't even done the basic
research. I couldn't believe it when one of the professors
actually asked what the acronym WMD stood for! Finally, the
rants about corporate conglomerates had little evidence backing
them.When I asked about the historical trend of a pro-war
media, regardless of the existence or non-existence of large
corporations, the issue was dropped.
I will continue to attend campus discussions, but I hope
that in the future, I will walk away with more than I came
in with.
|