Letter From the Editor:
Peace and Picking Up Your Trash
Walking back from a class on Wednesday afternoon, I took a
shortcut to my room through Walker Beach. The protest had
ended about an hour before, and there was trash all over the
grass. Signs, napkins, paper, salsa containers, and protest
chant lyrics were strewn across the beach. It was sad to think
that after an afternoon of raising awareness about peace and
respect, some people did not think to respect housekeeping
and the groundskeepers enough to clean up after themselves.
The scene left me feeling like students sacrificed their days
from 11 a.m. to 4 p.m., and as soon as the event was over,
people walked away without a second thought.
I did not strike on Wednesday. I did not even think about
striking. While I disagree with the idea of our government
invading Iraq, and I have since President Bush first began
to discuss it months ago, somehow striking did not feel
right. I could not figure out why people insisted upon striking,
specifically instead of simply holding a protest. It seemed
to me that a protest held on a Friday or Saturday night, which
would conflict with weekend plans, would show more commitment
than providing an essentially excused absence to attend a
protest.
A common explanation I heard for striking was that by sacrificing
a day of classes (or other normal activities) students could
stand in solidarity with people whose daily lives would be
affected by the war. I found this response appalling. To draw
a comparison of solidarity between those "sacrificing"
class and those who fear war will erupt in their back yards
is absurd.
Even more absurd, for me, was the suggestion that "sacrificing
our education makes a powerful statement," which one
protestor claimed. Strikers did not leave college to volunteer
to work for international peace organizations, they missed
a day of class. The following day, they returned to class
and went on with their lives and their semesters. I think
missing class to attend a protest is completely valid, but
saying that you are consciously sacrificing your education
or sacrificing your day in solidarity is a bit of a
stretch.
The peace movement is large and diverse; the movement against
this particular potential war is even more so. While I am
somewhat critical of the symbolism purported in this particular
demonstration, I am glad it occurred on campus. I know that
sounds contradictory, but it is not. I believe in peace, and
I support others who believe in peace. I support their efforts
to be proactive, even if I choose not to participate in some
that do not appeal to me. The fact that I was initially bothered
and felt alienated by the form that the protest took was not
as important as recognizing that there were people who believed
in it as a way of expressing their opposition to a war in
Iraq. The strikers and I wanted the same things.
I hope that the students who wore red and/or decided to strike
did not look around at their peers who did not participate
and think that they must support the war, or that the non-participants
simply considered their own daily activities to important
to forego. Individuals chose to strike for a multitude of
very different and probably very personal reasons, but those
of us who chose not to, particularly those of us oppose the
impending war and still chose not to strike, had reasons equally
multitudinous and personal. With all of us sincerely working
toward peace, we need only agree on our goal - we can each
approach it differently... but whatever forms of activism
and expression we choose, they should involve cleaning up
after ourselves.
|