Enthusiastic Anti-War Protesters
Throng Streets of San Francisco
By Charles Proctor
Daily Bruin (U. California-Los Angeles)
They seem to spring up overnight. They travel by train, car,
bus, plane, bicycle or foot. They come in ones, twos, threes,
small groups or massive armies.
They engage in curbside debates or tabletop discussions,
arguing politics, ethics, history, war and peace. They represent
one of the loudest and fastest-moving movements in the world,
an unparalleled coalition of ethnicities, religions, ages
and cultures.
And, for the most part, they never know one another's names.
In a show of solidarity with the international community,
more than 100,000 protesters turned out in San Francisco on
Sunday in the culmination of two days worth of anti-war protests
around the world. As they flooded city sidewalks and flowed
down back alleys, the demonstrators adhered to one common
cause, and yet their reasons for protesting were as diverse
as their faces and the clothes they wore.
For Terresa Gonzalez, a native of Union City, her reason
for protesting extended beyond mere politics.
"I have two sons, and both could go to war. And I don't
want them to go," she said. "To me, (Bush) doesn't
seem to listen to any reasons. It's getting closer to the
point when he will say 'Yes' to (war)."
Luis Gonzalez, 25, one of Terresa's sons and a part-time
student at Chabot College in Hayward, Calif., shrugged when
asked about the draft. He has a friend in the military, he
explained, who hasn't been deployed to the Gulf yet.
"I don't feel scared -- anything like that," he
said.
Parental concern did play a factor in determining the turnout
of protesters, and entire families were much in evidence Sunday.
For some, though, the question was not so much of protection
as it was of lead-by-example.
Edgar Perez, a native of Oakland, Calif., had his 9-year-old
son Marcealo join him in a self-composed anti-war rap, much
to the astonishment and delight of onlookers.
"I figure I have to put something together so my children
can see me express myself and learn to express themselves,"
he said as his son paraded about behind him with a microphone.
Other children found different, although equally artistic
ways of expressing themselves. Under the guidance of parents,
dozens of kids carved out peace signs across Embarcadero Plaza
with chalk and decorated the cement with murals. One picture
of a crudely drawn tank was punctuated by a child's handwriting:
"No Tanks."
As the rally dwindled into the late afternoon and protesters
made their way back through the city streets, many could be
found enjoying coffee or an early dinner in one of San Francisco's
countless cafes. Here, too, the diversity of opinions was
expansive.
At Cafe Venue on Market Street, Brian Twitchell of Oakland,
Calif., sat underneath an awning with his sister as protesters
trickled away. A four-year veteran of the Marine Corps, Twitchell
says his knowledge of military history was what ultimately
disillusioned him.
"I felt the military was being used for economic gain,
not for upholding democracy," he said, citing repeated
military incursions "to protect national interests abroad."
"It's all in the history," he said.
Twitchell said he never experienced combat, having served
in the period between Beirut and the Gulf War, but that doesn't
dissuade him.
"I don't feel I have to experience that aspect to know
it's not a good thing," he said.
Bethany Twitchell, sitting at the adjacent table, says she
joined the anti-war movement out of ideology.
"To me, (war) just contradicts the whole purpose of
why the United States is here," she said, adding that
for the United States to endorse democracy and yet pursue
unilateral action was immoral.
"I've always felt that if it was going to happen, it
should be a U.N. initiative. It's not for the United States
to decide."
Most of the protesters seemed generally determined to make
a difference by joining the anti-war movement, although some
acknowledged such a difference would be hard to measure.
"I'm here just as another body," said Jeff Johnson,
a Berkeley native, shrugging indifferently near Cafe Venue's
front door. "They can't silence us. We're too obvious."
Johnson said the lack of debate about war was what disturbed
him the most.
"I feel the administration is allowed to control the
debate," he said, adding that the media often do not
ask tough enough questions.
At another table, Sara Leimbach and Summer Pendle said they
drove all the way from Southern California to join the protest.
"There's a sense of helplessness, a sense of inevitability
about the war, and I want to feel like I've done something
to make a difference," said Leimbach, a resident of Rancho
Santa Margarita.
Pendle, a third-year political science student at Irvine
Valley College, said she came to San Francisco to march with
similar-minded people, something she found sorely lacking
at Irvine.
"It's more not to feel alone. No one seems to be doing
anything, they're just mouthing rhetoric," she said.
But how effective will the protest movement be? Even the
answer to that varied from person to person, and while some
were optimistic, others were not so sure.
"I see Bush's momentum really meeting some resistance,"
said Johnson, pointing to both increased turnout at protests
and the dissent expressed by many countries in the United
Nations.
Pendle, however, disagreed.
"If the world community can't change the administration's
opinion, I doubt the protesters will make a difference,"
she said.
But she added that even if the objective were next to impossible
to obtain, it was the effort that counted.
Bethany was more blunt in expressing her prediction, in spite
of all the principles she believes in.
"Ultimately," she said, "Bush is going to
get what he wants."
Copyright ©2003 Daily Bruin via U-Wire
|