Democrats Are No Longer Electable
By The Editorial Board
So, by now any person concerned about the state of the United
States of America as a viable nation in the global community
with a mandate to establish justice, insure domestic
tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general
welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves
and our posterity must be concerned that the most cynically
conservative supermajority since the Gilded Age with no intention
of adhering to the old liberal values of that particular preamble
now controls three branches of the federal government. More
disturbing is that, unlike the previous election, this appears
to have happened by the will of the voting public, for what
thats worth. All sides will concede that our voting
turnout is the most anemic of any democracy.
Yes, we certainly reject advanced state capitalisms
electoral veneer, with its two-hour lawsuits, its thirty-second,
rapid-fire image distribution and its various types of ballot
systems (geographical overlays of which look suspiciously
like those maps that delineate the various forms of execution
in our great land: optical scan, lethal injection, punch-card,
electric chair, electronic ballot, lever, gas chamber, etc.).
Yes, we concede that a cynically conservative supermajority
across the whole government will probably further the Marxian-Hegelian
engine of history as the re-burgeoning anithetical
protest movement will become stronger and our youth-popular
culture apparatus will certainly become radicalized, late-eighties
style. We do indeed look forward to this, perhaps more so
than we would welcome a tepid Democrat-controlled Senate.
All things considered, however, there will still be marked
disadvantages on the ground that will follow from
a completely Republican government: the judiciary will be
reactionary for years to come, the justice department will
have far less restraint in curtailing the civil liberties
of the various minority groups of America (Democrats sadly
included now) and President Bush will be able to pursue his
schizophrenic and destablizing foreign policy with impunity.
When explained to the American people in terms that respect
them as free-thinking individuals, the Republican agenda is
notably unpopular. However, even fairly progressive Minnesota
(which had nearly a sixty percent voter turnout involving
an Iron Range-rural labor turnout of nineteen-sixties proportions)
elected a Republican senator over Vice President Mondale,
a Republican governor and sent the first non-Democrat majority
House delegation to Washington since the 1978 Minnesota
Massacre.
For this, we must place blame solely on the shoulders of the
Democratic National Committee. Why? Throughout this painfully
inane campaign season, they offered the electorate no coherent
alternative economic or foreign policy, choosing instead to
walk a thin line between supporting the president out of self-interested
fear and offering vague, vapid sound bites of uneasiness with
the administration. In other words, the Democrats ran as the
Republicans Lite. Both fundraising machines are now sufficiently
implicated within the same corporate donor structure that
from a purely economic standpoint it is now impossible to
distinguish between the two parties strategies, save
the inevitable fact that the Democrats will never quite match
the Republicans in real dollars. In other words, the Democrats
can never beat the Republicans at their own game; this is
the sad legacy of Bill Clinton, for he was the only Democratic
politican of the current governing generation who ever could.
The rest (clinging desperately to Mr. Clinton, their only
real post-Kennedy success story) are doomed to try, and fail.
With the tragic death of Senator Wellstone, there is no longer
any member of the Senate in the Congressional Progressive
Caucus, a truly sad state of affairs. We submit to you, dear
reader, that the Democrats are (sadly) an increasingly irrelevant
party and that it is time for Representative Barbara Lee and
her fellow progressives to jump ship to either form their
own party or join the Greens.
The people of the United States of America will vote for a
principled, viable, progressive agenda, given the chance.
For example, in the spirit of the PPA Senior panel discussion
on the AIDS pandemic on November 6, the day after election
day, we submit that $7.5 billion of the money we spend on
defense/dealing with the diplomatic fallout of
our regressive foreign policy would be better spent on fully
funding generic anti-retroviral drugs for sub-Saharan Africa,
which could essentially cure AIDS in the region. This would
truly be a positive step for the United States as a progressive,
global citizen in such a way that would move us beyond the
facile question why do they hate us? and would
constitute a more accurate and less costly war on terrorism,
as it were.
|